……Beyong the noise where depth meets success in UPSC preparation
CIC합격보장가능시험대비자료 & CIC최신버전덤프문제
Itcertkr의 도움으로 여러분은 많은 시간과 돈을 들이지 않으셔도 혹은 여러학원등을 다니시지 않으셔도 우리 덤프로 안전하게 시험을 통과하실 수 있습니다.CBIC CIC시험자료는 우리 Itcertkr에서 실제시험에 의하여 만들어진 것입니다. 지금까지의 시험문제와 답과 시험문제분석 등입니다. Itcertkr에서 제공하는CBIC CIC시험자료의 문제와 답은 실제시험의 문제와 답과 아주 비슷합니다.
Pass4Tes가 제공하는 제품을 사용함으로 여러분은 IT업계하이클래스와 멀지 않았습니다. Pass4Tes 가 제공하는 인증시험덤프는 여러분을CBIC인증CIC시험을 안전하게 통과는 물론 관연전업지식장악에도 많은 도움이 되며 또한 우리는 일년무료 업뎃서비스를 제공합니다.
CIC합격보장 가능 시험대비자료 최신 시험 기출문제 모음 자료
CBIC CIC덤프구매에 관심이 있는데 선뜻 구매결정을 하지 못하는 분이라면 사이트에 있는 demo를 다운받아 보시면CBIC CIC시험패스에 믿음이 생길것입니다. CBIC CIC덤프는 시험문제변경에 따라 업데이트하여 항상 가장 최선버전이도록 유지하기 위해 최선을 다하고 있습니다.
최신 Infection Control CIC 무료샘플문제 (Q66-Q71):
질문 # 66
Which of the following options describes a correct use of personal protective equipment?
정답：A
설명：
According toCDC and APIC guidelines, asurgical mask is requiredwhen performinglumbar puncturesto prevent bacterial contamination (e.g., meningitis caused by droplet transmission of oral flora).
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect?
* A. Personal eyeglasses should be worn during suctioning-Incorrectbecauseeyeglasses do not provide adequate eye protection. Goggles or face shields should be used.
* C. Gloves should be worn when handling or touching a cardiac monitor that has been disinfected- Not necessaryunless recontamination is suspected.
* D. Eye protection should be worn when providing patient care after unprotected exposure- Eye protection should be usedbefore exposure, not just after.
CBIC Infection Control Reference
APIC states that surgical masks must be worn for procedures such as lumbar puncture to reduce infection risk.
질문 # 67
Working with public health agencies to collect and analyze indicators that might signal an increase in community illness is an example of which type of surveillance?
정답：B
설명：
Surveillance is a critical tool in infection prevention and control, used to monitor disease trends and guide public health responses. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes the "Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain, which aligns with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice" (3rd Edition, 2012).
The question describes a process of collecting and analyzing indicators to signal an increase in community illness, requiring identification of the appropriate surveillance type among the options provided.
Option C, "Syndromic," is the correct answer. Syndromic surveillance involves monitoring non-specific health indicators or symptoms (e.g., fever, respiratory complaints, or gastrointestinal issues) that may precede a formal diagnosis, aiming to detect potential outbreaks or increases in community illness early. The CDC defines syndromic surveillance as the real-time or near-real-time collection, analysis, and interpretation of health-related data to provide actionable information, often in collaboration with public health agencies. This approach uses data from sources like emergency department visits, over-the-counter medication sales, or absenteeism reports to identify trends before laboratory confirmation, making it well-suited to the described scenario of signaling community illness increases.
Option A, "Passive," involves healthcare providers or laboratories reporting cases to public health authorities on a voluntary or mandatory basis without active prompting (e.g., routine notifiable disease reporting). While passive surveillance contributes to baseline data, it is less proactive and not specifically designed to signal early increases in illness, making it less fitting. Option B, "Active," entails public health officials actively seeking data from healthcare facilities or providers (e.g., calling to confirm cases during an outbreak). This is more resource-intensive and typically used for specific investigations rather than ongoing community trend monitoring, which aligns better with syndromic methods. Option D, "Targeted," refers to surveillance focused on a specific population, disease, or event (e.g., monitoring TB in a high-risk group). The scenario's broad focus on community illness indicators does not suggest a targeted approach.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines highlight syndromic surveillance as a key strategy for early detection of community-wide health threats, often involving collaboration with public health agencies. Option C best matches the described activity of analyzing indicators to signal illness increases, making it the correct choice.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice, 3rd Edition, 2012.
* CDC Syndromic Surveillance Systems, 2020.
질문 # 68
Which of the following processes is MOST important for the infection preventionist (IP) to review when evaluating a third-party reprocessor for single-use devices?
정답：B
설명：
The correct answer is A, "Observe all steps for reprocessing," as this is the most important process for the infection preventionist (IP) to review when evaluating a third-party reprocessor for single-use devices.
According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, the reprocessing of single-use devices (SUDs) by third-party entities must adhere to stringent infection control standards to ensure they are safe for reuse and do not contribute to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).
Observing all steps-such as cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, packaging, and quality control-allows the IP to directly assess compliance with manufacturer instructions, regulatory requirements (e.g., FDA guidelines), and best practices (e.g., AAMI ST91) (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment). This hands-on evaluation is critical because any deviation in the reprocessing chain can compromise device sterility and patient safety.
Option B (review the facility's blueprints and policies) provides context about the physical layout and procedural framework, but it is a preliminary step that does not directly verify the reprocessing process's effectiveness. Option C (ensure air and water cultures are performed regularly) is important for monitoring environmental contamination risks, particularly in sterile processing areas, but it is a supportive measure rather than the primary focus of evaluating the reprocessor's core activities. Option D (obtain feedback from other IPs who use the reprocessor) offers valuable peer insights, but it is subjective and secondary to direct observation, which provides firsthand evidence of compliance and performance.
The priority on observing reprocessing steps aligns with CBIC's emphasis on ensuring the safety and efficacy of reprocessed medical devices, a key responsibility for IPs when outsourcing to third-party reprocessors (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competency 3.5 - Evaluate the environment for infection risks). This process enables the IP to identify specific weaknesses, validate adherence to standards, and make informed decisions about the reprocessor's suitability.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain III: Infection Prevention and Control, Competencies 3.3 - Ensure safe reprocessing of medical equipment, 3.5 - Evaluate the environment for infection risks. AAMI ST91:2015, Flexible and semi-rigid endoscope processing in health care facilities.
질문 # 69
During the past week, three out of four blood cultures from a febrile neonate in an intensive care unit grew coagulase-negative staphylococci. This MOST likely indicates:
정답：B
설명：
The scenario involves a febrile neonate in an intensive care unit (ICU) with three out of four blood cultures growing coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) over the past week. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes accurate interpretation of microbiological data in the
"Identification of Infectious Disease Processes" domain, aligning with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for healthcare-associated infections. Determining whether this represents a true infection, contamination, colonization, or laboratory error requires evaluating the clinical and microbiological context.
Option B, "Contamination," is the most likely indication. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, are common skin flora and frequent contaminants in blood cultures, especially in neonates where skin preparation or sampling technique may be challenging. The CDC's "Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections" (2017) and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) note that multiple positive cultures (e.g., two or more) are typically required to confirm true bacteremia, particularly with CoNS, unless accompanied by clear clinical signs of infection (e.g., worsening fever, hemodynamic instability) and no other explanation. The inconsistency (three out of four cultures) and the neonate's ICU setting-where contamination from skin or catheter hubs is common-suggest that the positive cultures likely result from contamination during blood draw rather than true infection. Studies, such as those in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology (e.g., Beekmann et al., 2005), indicate that CoNS in blood cultures is contaminated in 70-80% of cases when not supported by robust clinical correlation.
Option A, "Laboratory error," is possible but less likely as the primary explanation. Laboratory errors (e.g., mislabeling or processing mistakes) could occur, but the repeated growth in three of four cultures suggests a consistent finding rather than a random error, making contamination a more plausible cause. Option C,
"Colonization," refers to the presence of microorganisms on or in the body without invasion or immune response. While CoNS can colonize the skin or catheter sites, colonization does not typically result in positive blood cultures unless there is an invasive process, which is not supported by the data here. Option D,
"Infection," is the least likely without additional evidence. True CoNS bloodstream infections (e.g., catheter- related) in neonates are serious but require consistent positive cultures, clinical deterioration (e.g., persistent fever, leukocytosis), and often imaging or catheter removal confirmation. The febrile state alone, with inconsistent culture results, does not meet the CDC's criteria for diagnosing infection (e.g., at least two positive cultures from separate draws).
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines stress differentiating contamination from infection to avoid unnecessary treatment, which can drive antibiotic resistance. Given the high likelihood of contamination with CoNS in this context, Option B is the most accurate answer.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, 2017.
* Beekmann, S. E., et al. (2005). Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci in Blood Cultures. Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
* CLSI Guidelines on Blood Culture Interpretation, 2018.
질문 # 70
What question would be appropriate for an infection preventionist to ask when reviewing the discussion section of an original article?
정답：C
설명：
When reviewing the discussion section of an original article, an infection preventionist must focus on critically evaluating the interpretation of the study findings, their relevance to infection control, and their implications for practice. The discussion section typically addresses the meaning of the results, compares them to existing literature, and considers limitations or alternative interpretations. The appropriate question should align with the purpose of this section and reflect the infection preventionist's need to assess the validity and applicability of the research. Let's analyze each option:
* A. Was the correct sample size and analysis method chosen?: This question pertains to the methodology section of a research article, where the study design, sample size, and statistical methods are detailed.
While these elements are critical for assessing the study's rigor, they are not the primary focus of the discussion section, which interprets results rather than re-evaluating the study design. An infection preventionist might ask this during a review of the methods section, but it is less relevant here.
* B. Could alternative explanations account for the observed results?: The discussion section often explores whether the findings can be explained by factors other than the hypothesized cause, such as confounding variables, bias, or chance. This question is highly appropriate foran infection preventionist, as it encourages a critical assessment of whether the results truly support infection control interventions or if other factors (e.g., environmental conditions, patient factors) might be responsible. This aligns with CBIC's emphasis on evidence-based practice, where understanding the robustness of conclusions is key to applying research to infection prevention strategies.
* C. Is the study question important, appropriate, and stated clearly?: This question relates to the introduction or background section of an article, where the research question and its significance are established. While important for overall study evaluation, it is not specific to the discussion section, which focuses on interpreting results rather than revisiting the initial question. An infection preventionist might consider this earlier in the review process, but it does not fit the context of the discussion section.
* D. Are criteria used to measure the exposure and the outcome explicit?: This question is relevant to the methods section, where the definitions and measurement tools for exposures (e.g., a specific intervention) and outcomes (e.g., infection rates) are described. The discussion section may reference these criteria but focuses more on their implications rather than their clarity. This makes it less appropriate for the discussion section specifically.
The discussion section is where authors synthesize their findings, address limitations, and consider alternative explanations, making option B the most fitting. For an infection preventionist, evaluating alternative explanations is crucial to ensure that recommended practices (e.g., hand hygiene protocols or sterilization techniques) are based on solid evidence and not confounded by unaddressed variables. This critical thinking is consistent with CBIC's focus on applying research to improve infection control outcomes.
:
CBIC Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Core Competency Model (updated 2023), Domain I:
Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, which emphasizes critical evaluation of research evidence.
CBIC Examination Content Outline, Domain V: Management and Communication, which includes assessing the validity of research findings for infection control decision-making.
질문 # 71
......
CBIC CIC 인증시험은 최근 가장 핫한 시험입니다. 인기가 높은 만큼CBIC CIC시험을 패스하여 취득하게 되는 자격증의 가치가 높습니다. 이렇게 좋은 자격증을 취득하는데 있어서의 필수과목인CBIC CIC시험을 어떻게 하면 한번에 패스할수 있을가요? 그 비결은 바로Itcertkr의 CBIC CIC덤프를 주문하여 가장 빠른 시일내에 덤프를 마스터하여 시험을 패스하는것입니다.
CIC최신버전 덤프문제: https://www.itcertkr.com/CIC_exam.html
CBIC인증 CIC덤프만 공부하시면 아무런 우려없이 시험 보셔도 됩니다, CBIC CIC합격보장 가능 시험대비자료 덤프에 있는 문제만 공부하면 되기에 시험일이 며칠뒤라도 시험패스는 문제없습니다, 혹시나 답장이 늦더라도 주문하시면 CIC덤프는 시스템 자동으로 바로 발송되기에 안심하시고 결제하셔도 됩니다.저희 CIC덤프는 가장 최신버전이기에 CIC시험적중율이 높습니다, Itcertkr CIC최신버전 덤프문제덤프는 고객님께서 필요한것이 무엇인지 너무나도 잘 알고 있답니다, CBIC 인증CIC시험대비덤프에는 시험문제의 모든 예상문제와 시험유형이 포함되어있어 시험준비자료로서 가장 좋은 선택입니다.
생각은 그랬지만 입안이 바싹 마르고 두 주먹이 바들바들 떨렸다, 은혜를 갚는 법, 있어요, CBIC인증 CIC덤프만 공부하시면 아무런 우려없이 시험 보셔도 됩니다, 덤프에 있는 문제만 공부하면 되기에 시험일이 며칠뒤라도 시험패스는 문제없습니다.
CIC합격보장 가능 시험대비자료 덤프로 CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam 시험을 한방에 패스가능
혹시나 답장이 늦더라도 주문하시면 CIC덤프는 시스템 자동으로 바로 발송되기에 안심하시고 결제하셔도 됩니다.저희 CIC덤프는 가장 최신버전이기에 CIC시험적중율이 높습니다, Itcertkr덤프는 고객님께서 필요한것이 무엇인지 너무나도 잘 알고 있답니다.
CBIC 인증CIC시험대비덤프에는 시험문제의 모든 예상문제와 시험유형이 포함되어있어 시험준비자료로서 가장 좋은 선택입니다.